Photo

EDIT: Ravens Trade For Marcus Peters


  • Please log in to reply
129 replies to this topic

#121 BSLMikeRandall

BSLMikeRandall

    Sr. Ravens Analyst

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,914 posts

Posted 17 October 2019 - 11:00 PM

Great stuff Ken, as always.
@BSLMikeRandall

#122 DuffMan

DuffMan

    HOF

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,864 posts
  • LocationLinthicum, MD

Posted 21 October 2019 - 08:45 AM

Interesting tidbit from King's column this morning...

 

https://profootballt...ing/?cid=fmiatw

 

The Rams would have done the Peters deal even if they couldn’t get Ramsey. The rush on Peters came because Baltimore wanted a corner to play in Seattle on Sunday, and if they hadn’t gotten Peters on Tuesday, they’d have pivoted to one of two other prospective deals. Thus the Rams’ haste in dealing Peters.

 

I wonder what the other potential deals would have been...


  • BSLChrisStoner likes this

#123 ravens82

ravens82
  • Members
  • 367 posts
  • LocationEllicott City, MD

Posted 21 October 2019 - 10:49 AM

Interesting tidbit from King's column this morning...

 

https://profootballt...ing/?cid=fmiatw

 

 

I wonder what the other potential deals would have been...

 

I doubt they would have been any better.  Peters was a great acquisition, especially for the price!



#124 BSLGabeFerguson

BSLGabeFerguson

    Ravens Analyst

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,384 posts
  • LocationCity of Angels

Posted 21 October 2019 - 10:52 AM

I doubt they would have been any better.  Peters was a great acquisition, especially for the price!

I'm still shocked EDC was able to get Peters for a back-up LB and a 5th round pick. I know it's a rental and all, but still seems like a massive bargain.


@gabefergy

#125 BSLRobShields

BSLRobShields

    BSL Analyst

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 86,193 posts
  • LocationBaltimore

Posted 21 October 2019 - 03:20 PM

I'm still shocked EDC was able to get Peters for a back-up LB and a 5th round pick. I know it's a rental and all, but still seems like a massive bargain.


Hard to believe no one would beat it.
@BSLRobShields

#126 ravens82

ravens82
  • Members
  • 367 posts
  • LocationEllicott City, MD

Posted 21 October 2019 - 03:21 PM

Hard to believe no one would beat it.

 

I'm guessing it was because they wanted to get it done fast and the Ravens were ready to deal.



#127 BSLRobShields

BSLRobShields

    BSL Analyst

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 86,193 posts
  • LocationBaltimore

Posted 21 October 2019 - 03:23 PM

I'm guessing it was because they wanted to get it done fast and the Ravens were ready to deal.


I’m sure other teams would have done the same.

However, it’s also possible they didn’t want to send him to some of the other teams...like Philly for example.
@BSLRobShields

#128 ravens82

ravens82
  • Members
  • 367 posts
  • LocationEllicott City, MD

Posted 21 October 2019 - 04:24 PM

I’m sure other teams would have done the same.

However, it’s also possible they didn’t want to send him to some of the other teams...like Philly for example.

 

I'm sure they preferred to send Peters to the AFC.  They knew the Ravens were ready to make a move for a corner.  As per Harbaugh, they specifically asked for Kenny Young in the deal, so they must have liked something they saw in him...



#129 Steve55

Steve55

    Rookie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 553 posts

Posted 21 October 2019 - 05:37 PM

I'm sure they preferred to send Peters to the AFC.  They knew the Ravens were ready to make a move for a corner.  As per Harbaugh, they specifically asked for Kenny Young in the deal, so they must have liked something they saw in him...

 

I read he was 1st offered to Cleve.



#130 ravens82

ravens82
  • Members
  • 367 posts
  • LocationEllicott City, MD

Posted 21 October 2019 - 08:54 PM

I read he was 1st offered to Cleve.

 

Yeah, they thought since Dorsey drafted him in KC, he might be interested.  They wanted Bitonio.  Dorsey declined, luckily, and they ended up completing a separate deal for Corbett.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Partners