Not really. They are all based around thoughts I see on here.
Over the last few days particularly, you've consistently painted with a broad brush. When you've seen one person make one argument, you've shaped that into sweeping generalizations of what you think the arguments are as a whole.
It isn't just A&B points of views. It's a spectrum of thoughts. To me, you've reduced things to strawman arguments.
Here's an example of what I'm talking about. You've done it with a smile several times, but you've posted something to the effect of 'Jackson supporters', blame Flacco for everything, including x and y loss.
Somewhere in these large amounts of threads, I'm sure several posters have said Flacco was the reason.
But I know many others who would be labeled 'Jackson supporters' have argued less about 'Flacco' being the reason for any individual loss.
"This is my biggest issue with the Lamar group.
They are literally making shit up. Their arguments,, for the most part, are built on a foundation that quite frankly, doesn’t exist.
And when they are start saying stuff like, no way joe wins that game, it just looks stupid.
What they hold against Joe, they use as an excuse for Lamar. The consistency is awful and a lot of the arguments are just lies."
You have points where you disagree with directly with someone, continue to tell them why you disagree.
You think individuals have made ish up and been inconsistent? I agree, it's annoying when you see that. It's fine to call that out to any individual.
This post is generalizing though, and just as annoying to those who have been consistent in their arguments.